How Will You Use Digital Imaging?
December 22, 2009Once a new technology rolls over you, if you’re not part of the steamroller, you’re part of the road. - Stewart Brand
There is a technology that has been used in the Histotechnology for many years that is preparing to explode and promises to change all our lives - Digital Imaging. This technology will transform the Pathologists daily workload functions and remove the need for glass slides and the microscope. Is anyone considering the lives of the Histotechnologist? Doesn’t the Imager need a slide to image? Has this really been thought out from the process side?
I think the advancement of this technology is another example of the industry ignoring what really happens in a Histology lab and is assuming a slide is a slide. A “slide” is not the same from lab to lab, not even from day to day in some labs. And how many labs use the exact same equipment and reagents? How is this digital imaging going to transform the Histology process if we continue to ignore the basic principle of Standardization?
If we are going to be asked to provide digital images for diagnosis, would it not be better to produce an image that could be reviewed by multiple sites and Pathologists and provide a basis for collaboration, concordance and consultation? We continue to have “advances” pushed into Histology that do not advance the science of Anatomic Pathology. Would it not be better for the patient and health care if this technological advance actually reduced costs while providing another valuable link in the electronic record?
I see great uses for this technology in Histotechnology. I would not start with the routine H&E, but with the re-cuts, special stains and IHC. Once the basic H&E is reviewed, the aforementioned procedures most often produce a qualitative result that could be easily reviewed using the digital image. I know that breast tissue testing (i.e. ER/PR, Her2) are now used in a quantitative way, with the aid of complex software, but wouldn’t it be a great improvement to patient care and process flow to be able to provide the Pathologist with his re-cuts and all staining, post H&E, digitally? Think of the cost and time savings if there were a way to incorporate an imager into the staining instrument. Think of the advantages if the slide could be shared with multiple Pathologists, across multiple sites for instantaneous consultation. Histology results would truly travel at the speed of the Internet.
But wait, do you think a Pathologist outside of your lab will accept the stain quality produced in your lab and make the diagnosis? What do you see as the advantages or disadvantages of digital imaging expanding? How would you use the technology?
